Is Botswana Getting A Raw Deal From De Beers Diamonds - The World News [PLUS × MANUAL]

Under the previous long-term agreements, De Beers held the lion's share of the "marketing" power. While Botswana owned half the mines, the majority of the rough stones were sold through De Beers' global distribution network. The New Deal: Progress or Posturing?

But beneath the polish of that narrative, a seismic shift is occurring. As the global diamond market fragments, synthetic stones flood the market, and De Beers’ grip on the industry loosens, a burning question is echoing from the Kalahari Desert to the corridors of the London Stock Exchange: Under the previous long-term agreements, De Beers held

The current agreement allows De Beers to market the majority of Debswana’s production. The government has argued that the fees and royalties they receive do not reflect the true market value of the stones, especially as De Beers rebrands itself towards "ethical" and "conflict-free" diamonds. Botswana’s President Mokgweetsi Masisi has been vocal about this, suggesting that Botswana deserves a larger share of the pie because the diamonds are the foundation of De Beers' global reputation. But beneath the polish of that narrative, a

So, what can be done to ensure that Botswana gets a fair deal from De Beers diamonds? Here are a few suggestions: synthetic stones flood the market